Supply Chain — Equipment Packages

FPSO Equipment Packages: The Vendor Landscape by Discipline

September 2026·15 min read·Public data only

The package taxonomy

Before vendors, the shape of the scope itself: a typical FPSO topside/hull procurement list runs to roughly 150 discrete packages, organized by engineering discipline. Instrumentation (analyzers, control and safety valves) and mechanical (pumps, compression, gas handling, utility systems) together make up close to two-thirds of the package count — not because they're the highest-value items, but because they're the most numerous distinct equipment types.

Who actually supplies the high-value packages

Package count and package value point in different directions. The disciplines above are numerous but individually modest; the packages that move a bid's economics the most are concentrated in a handful of categories — and on Brazilian FPSOs, a short list of vendors keeps winning them.

Power generation & turbomachinery

Siemens Energy supplied the power generation and gas compression packages for P-78 (four gas turbine generator packages) and for the Sépia FPSO (P-85's field). More recently, Siemens Energy was selected to supply 16 modular power-and-compression skids — eight per unit — for SEAP-I (P-81) and SEAP-II (P-87), with the majority of that equipment assembled at Siemens Energy's own industrial complex in Santa Bárbara d'Oeste, São Paulo, specifically to meet local content requirements. Baker Hughes is the other major name in this category: it holds a five-year service agreement covering turbomachinery across roughly 19 Brazilian FPSOs (LM2500 and LM6000 turbines), and supplied LM2500 gas turbine generators for Equinor/Repsol Sinopec/Petrobras' BM-C-33 project.

Gas compression

Siemens Energy's Sergipe-Alagoas package above already covers compression as well as power. Separately, MAN Energy Solutions was contracted to supply eleven RB-type compressor trains for the FPSO destined for the Raia project in the Campos Basin — the same FPSO whose module fabrication contract went to Brasfels, covered on the shipyards page.

Pumps

Sulzer is the standout name here: Seatrium selected Sulzer to supply the water injection packages for P-84 and P-85 — three 9.5MW water injection pumps plus booster pumps per unit — bringing Sulzer's installed count to more than 1,300 pumps across eight FPSOs under construction for Petrobras. Separately, Sulzer Flow Equipment has been developing supercritical CO₂ pumps with TechnipFMC for Petrobras' HISEP subsea-separation pilot since 2017.

Mooring systems

SOFEC designed and supplied the spread mooring system for FPSO Bacalhau (Santos Basin) and for FPSO Almirante Barroso (MV32) in the Búzios field. The broader mooring-system market for FPSOs and FLNG units — turret, spread, and yoke systems — is otherwise concentrated among SBM Offshore, Bluewater, SOFEC, APL, and BW Offshore.

Subsea

TechnipFMC holds two recent Petrobras subsea contracts covering Brazil's pre-salt fields: one for flexible riser pipe, and a second for subsea production systems on the Atapu 2 (P-84's field), Sépia 2 (P-85's field), and Roncador developments — flexible and rigid pipe, umbilicals, pipeline end terminals, and termination assemblies, manufactured and serviced locally in Brazil.

Flare systems

John Zink Hamworthy Combustion and Zeeco are the two global leaders in flare and flare-gas-recovery systems (roughly 15% and 17% market share respectively), both active in offshore/FPSO applications worldwide, with FPSO-related installations in Brazil and West Africa reported to have grown 21% in 2024. Unlike the categories above, no specific Petrobras FPSO contract for either company was independently confirmed for this piece — so neither is attributed to a named platform here.

Electrical, automation & safety systems

ABB was selected by Seatrium to design and build the topside and hullside electrical systems, substation automation, and eHouses for P-84 and P-85, following an earlier award for the complete electrical-system automation on P-82 — three platforms in this site's dataset from one vendor in this category alone. Kongsberg Maritime holds the equivalent scope on a charter-model unit: an EPC agreement with Yinson to supply the E-house, electrical, control, and safeguarding systems — including fire and gas detection, emergency shutdown, and process shutdown — for Maria Quitéria, and previously supplied similar systems for BW Offshore's Cidade de São Vicente. Honeywell is a broader, less project-specific name in this category: it supplies integrated automation and safety-system platforms and, via Honeywell UOP, gas-processing technology across multiple Petrobras FPSOs, without a single contract confirmed here to a named platform.

Where the vendor list concentrates: P-84 and P-85

Laying the confirmed contracts above against this site's 18-platform dataset shows where the sourcing actually clusters. Siemens Energy alone is confirmed on five of the eighteen platforms; no other vendor here is confirmed on more than two. And two platforms — P-84 (Atapu) and P-85 (Sépia) — are each independently confirmed with three different major package vendors, more than any other platform in the dataset:

P-84 and P-85 being the most vendor-mapped platforms here isn't a coincidence of my research — they're the two newest, most recently reported EPC/EPCC units, so recent trade press has more to say about their package awards than about older, already-producing platforms. It's a reminder that this table reflects reporting density as much as it reflects the actual vendor landscape: better-documented projects will always look more "concentrated" than ones where the press simply moved on after first oil.

Local content at the package level

The local content page covers the requirement field-by-field, at the level of a whole EPC or BOT contract. One layer down, the same commitment gets satisfied — or not — package by package, and the four vendors below show four different answers to the same question: build it in Brazil, or import it.

Kongsberg's case is the useful outlier: it isn't dodging local content out of disinterest — it has decades of Brazilian presence, over 200 local employees, and designs behind more than 50 offshore vessels built in Brazil. The company simply finds, for this specific package category, that Brazil's own tax-law exceptions make importing the finished equipment cheaper than manufacturing it domestically. That's the sharpest illustration on this page of the point made on the local content page: the requirement is a negotiated, package-specific variable, not a uniform rule that every vendor in every category satisfies the same way.

The practical takeaway for reading a bid's vendor list: package count tells you almost nothing about where the value or the schedule risk sits. A handful of turbomachinery, compression, pump, mooring, and subsea packages — a small fraction of the ~150 total — carry the vendors, the lead times, and the price volatility that actually move a bid's competitiveness. Everything else on the list matters for completeness, not for differentiation.

See also: the full 18-platform benchmarking piece, EPC/EPCC cost analysis, local content strategy, and Brazilian shipyards & moduleiros.